Ashoka University Professor Accused Of Stealing Mohenjodaro Dancing Girl Replica From Delhi Museum

A professor of a private university was briefly arrested for allegedly stealing a replica of the iconic Mohenjo-Daro Dancing Girl statue from the National Museum in Delhi.

An Ashoka University professor was briefly detained for allegedly taking a replica of the famous Mohenjodaro Dancing Girl statue from Delhi's National Museum.

The 46-year-old professor works at the private university located in Sonipat, Haryana.

Ashoka University Professor Accused Of Stealing Mohenjodaro Dancing Girl Replica From Delhi Museum

According to police sources, the professor maintained there was no intention to steal the artifact.

The incident occurred on Saturday afternoon around 2:40pm when a CISF head constable discovered that a replica was missing from one of the museum galleries. Museum staff were immediately notified, and a search was conducted.

The investigation led to the identification of the professor, and the missing replica was discovered in his possession.

Delhi Police were contacted by the CISF, resulting in the professor's arrest. He was charged under sections 305(e) (theft in a dwelling, means of transport or place of worship) and 317(2) (handling stolen property) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

Despite the arrest, the professor was granted bail on the same day.

Police sources revealed that the professor claimed the incident was accidental. He stated that while he had purchased three legitimate replicas from the museum, he had unintentionally placed the Dancing Girl replica in his bag.

Officers noted that CCTV footage appears to corroborate his explanation.

Ashoka University issued a brief statement saying, "The incident that happened at the National Museum on Saturday was brought to our attention. The University will conduct an inquiry to examine the matter."

Police officials explained that an arrest was necessary because the complaint originated from the CISF.

However, initial evidence, including security camera recordings, suggests the professor may not have acted with deliberate intent.

The investigation into this case continues.