Tamil Nadu Court Battle: Thirupparankundram Deepam Controversy Continues as DMK Defends Traditional Practices

Despite the court orders, the petitioner has not been able to light the lamp on the Deepathoon pillar.

Chennai:

On a day a two-judge bench of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed the Tamil Nadu government's appeal in the Thirupparankundram Deepam contempt case - and the single judge permitted again the petitioner to light the Karthigai Deepam on the ancient hilltop pillar under police protection - the ruling DMK has stated this development is "not a setback" for the party. The party insisted that the judiciary must also "respect the powers of the state."

The court had previously noted that its December 1 directive to light the lamp on the ancient pillar had not been implemented, and consequently the petitioner was allowed to light the lamp with security. The bench also questioned the state's management of the situation, which prompted the contempt proceedings.

DMK: "We Work for Devotees of Lord Muruga, Not Against Them"

Addressing the court's decision, DMK spokesperson TKS Elangovan told NDTV that the ruling party perceives no political or moral setback in the controversy.

"We work for the devotees of Lord Muruga in Thirupparankundram. This is not a setback for the DMK," he stated.

Directly challenging the petitioner, Elangovan claimed that those leading the litigation were disconnected from local traditions. "A group that has no connection with the place wants to change the place of lighting the lamp - against the practice followed for so many years by Hindus in Thirupparankundram".

He also alleged the petitioners were politicizing a religious custom. "Petitioners are the ones fighting against the Hindus now. DMK isn't lighting the lamp - we are only respecting tradition."

"Our Stand Will Not Affect DMK in 2026"

When questioned whether the controversy might impact the DMK's prospects in the 2026 Tamil Nadu Assembly elections, Elangovan dismissed this possibility. "Our stand won't affect the DMK's prospects in 2026. People will understand that the BJP is anti-Hindu, anti-Scheduled Castes, and anti-OBCs."

He contended that the DMK's position aligns with local sentiment and established tradition. "We want to respect the sentiments of local people," he emphasized.

DMK: Court Must Also Respect State's Constitutional Powers

Regarding the High Court not fully accepting the state's position, Elangovan asserted that constitutional boundaries must be maintained. "The court should respect our view. Law and order is with the state. Why should the court assign it to a central agency? Can the court violate the Constitution?" he questioned.

When noted that the CISF was assigned because the state failed to provide security to the petitioner, Elangovan responded: "We provided security. Trouble was created by people who aren't from Thirupparankundram."

What The Row Is About

The lighting of the lamp at the hilltop temple of Subramaniya Swamy at Thiruparankundram in Tamil Nadu's Madurai district is considered an important ritual performed during the Hindu festival of Karthigai Deepam -- a celebration symbolizing the triumph of light over darkness.

Issues began during British era and the privy council had established a ruling that the ownership of the hill belongs to the temple except the dargah on the hilltop and an area called Nellithoppu.

The ancient pillar called Deepathoon is 15 metres from the dargah. Since 1862, the lamp is lit near the Uchipillayar Temple at a lower level from the dargah.

In 2014, a two-judge bench of the Madras High Court had ruled against lighting lamps on the Deepathoon.

This time, a fresh petition was filed by an individual at the Madurai bench of the Madras High Court seeking permission to light the traditional Karthigai Deepam at the pillar on the hill. The judge directed that the Deepam be lit at the hilltop too on the pillar and instructed the temple administration to make arrangements.

The temple authorities, however, lit the lamp at the usual spot as the state issued prohibitory orders banning large gatherings.

On a contempt petition filed the same day, Justice GR Swaminathan issued an order permitting the petitioner to proceed to the spot with ten others and CISF security personnel. The bench also dismissed the Tamil Nadu government's appeal in the matter.

The state maintains that the local community at Thiruparankundram lives in harmony and the new lamp would hurt the sentiments of Hindu devotees. It argues the petitioner and others demanding lighting on the pillar are hurting sentiments of devotees in Thiruparankundram.

Contempt Case Continues; Lamp Still Not Lit on Hilltop

Despite the court orders, the petitioner has not yet been able to light the lamp on the Deepathoon pillar. The contempt petition is scheduled to be heard again tomorrow, and the temple administration's appeal plea is still awaiting listing, keeping the Thirupparankundram lighting dispute very much active.